The right access for each role
Court-scoped permissions and server-side role checks limit access to authorized records and actions. Staff, counsel, and jurors have distinct access paths.
Security & procurement
Security built around your court.
Court work carries real responsibility. Court Nox brings controlled access, protected connections, and reviewable activity records to everyday jury management.
Practical safeguards
Protect the information.
Keep the work moving.
Security should support the way your court works. Our platform uses established SaaS security practices, including server-side access checks, encrypted connections, and account controls.
Protected connections
Production uses HTTPS to encrypt connections in transit. The database and document storage are configured behind the application, not as public-facing services.
Activity you can review
Audit logs capture the user, court, request, result, and timing for protected workflows. Designated sensitive fields are redacted from request records.
Account access you can manage
Inactive accounts are blocked, and session controls allow previously issued sign-ins to be invalidated. Access is enforced by the server, not just hidden in the interface.
Have a technical checklist? We can review the architecture and controls relevant to your court.
Buying & implementation
A clear path from questions to rollout.
Every court has its own review process. We work with your clerk, court leadership, and IT team to understand yours.
Start a procurement conversationTell us what your court needs
Share your workflows, IT requirements, purchasing process, and target start date. Bring your security questionnaire if you have one.
Review the details together
Work through access, hosting, data handling, integrations, accessibility, and support. We distinguish current capabilities from items that need further work.
Agree on a plan before rollout
Confirm the scope, pricing, responsibilities, and acceptance criteria so your court knows what to expect before implementation.
Continual improvement
A commitment that continues.
Protecting information and making software easier to use are ongoing responsibilities. Our roadmap covers product improvements, supporting documentation, and future independent assessments.
Accessibility improvements
Working toward WCAG 2.2 AA
Our roadmap covers keyboard access, screen readers, readable interfaces, and court documents. A documented evaluation and remediation process will support a future Accessibility Conformance Report.
Read our accessibility statementAssurance readiness planning
Planning around buyer requirements
We are organizing control documentation and evaluating the steps toward independent assurance. SOC 2 readiness and potential FedRAMP or GovRAMP pathways are roadmap work, guided by the requirements of the courts we serve.
More about assessment statusCommon questions
Details for your review.
Need something specific for your IT or purchasing team?
Ask us at info@courtnox.com
Can you complete our security questionnaire?
Yes. Send your questionnaire, purchasing timeline, and any specific requirements to info@courtnox.com. We will work through the response with your team using the product and deployment in scope, and identify any items that need additional evidence or work.
How do you separate access between courts?
Court Nox uses authorized court contexts and court-scoped data access, with role and permission checks for protected workflows. Users who work across courts need access to each court. We can discuss your isolation requirements during the security review.
How do SOC 2, FedRAMP, and GovRAMP fit into your roadmap?
Our roadmap includes SOC 2 readiness planning and evaluating FedRAMP and GovRAMP pathways where customer requirements call for them. This is planning, not a completed SOC 2 examination or a government authorization. Formal assessment scope and timelines have not been committed. Share any required assurance standard early so we can assess the path with your team.
What if our court has specific security or data requirements?
We review requirements for the jurisdiction, data, and deployment rather than assume one checklist fits every court. Hosting location, retention, recovery, support, and any applicable CJIS or other obligations should be reviewed and agreed before purchase. Available evidence and any remaining work are addressed in that review.
Is an Accessibility Conformance Report available?
An Accessibility Conformance Report (ACR), prepared using a VPAT, is planned after a documented evaluation and remediation process. WCAG 2.2 Level AA is our product target; a formal evaluation is not yet complete. Our accessibility statement explains the current work, known limitations, and how to request assistance.
See Court Nox in action